91 retained as part of the Enquiry record and considered as third-party information for disclosure purposes. 3. Interviews where the ‘person alleged to have caused harm’ is employed by a Registered Care Provider or a non-registered employment service and category 1 above does not apply. Where the ‘person alleged to have caused harm’ is employed by a Registered Provider responsibility for interviewing the ‘person alleged to have cause harm’ will rest with the employer, unless agreed otherwise with the SAP. Relevant information from the interview will be made available to the ERM to allow full consideration of any information the ‘person alleged to have caused harm’ has provided about the allegations. This information should be provided in the form of a summary of the investigative interview focussing particularly on evidence that will substantiate or refute whether harm has been caused. 4. Interviews where the ‘person alleged to have caused harm’ fits none of the above categories. Interviews with the ‘person alleged to have caused harm’ should not take place if to undertake them would pose an unacceptable risk to the adult at risk, other adults at risk or children. This will be determined by the SAP & EM, who must make a written record of this decision and the reasons for it. The obligations placed on the SAP in such a case are set out at 2 above.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy NTIyMzU=